Ask me where my wife is right now. I’ll get it right, down to the couch cushion.
Ask about my daughter Kayla, and I’ll get that right too. Her drive to work. Her Tuesday. I don’t have to think about it. I just know.
But when Shayna passed, when I asked myself “Where is she?”, my brain glitched. It returned a “that does not compute.”
Researcher Mary-Frances O’Connor’s describes it this way: we build a map for the people we’re attached to. Not a metaphor. An actual neural map, running underneath everything else. It tracks the people we love along three lines: space, time, and closeness. Where they are. When we’ll see them again. The tighter the bond, the more detailed the map.
That map is active right now, in all of us, for everyone we love. It’s why you can feel your spouse in the next room without looking up. It’s why you know, without checking a clock, that your kid is at practice until 5:30. The map does this work silently, constantly, in the background of an ordinary day, so quietly you never notice it’s there until it breaks.
Here’s the problem when someone we love passes.
The map doesn’t shut off. It doesn’t get the memo. It keeps generating the exact same predictions it always has, for a person who is no longer where the map insists they should be.
Six o’clock comes. The map expects the sound of the door. The door doesn’t open. The map doesn’t know what to do with that. So it runs the prediction again. And again. Not because you’re irrational. Because the map is doing its job. It just doesn’t have the one input it needs: an update it was never designed to receive.
That’s the part nobody prepares you for. Not the sadness, though there’s plenty of that. The malfunction. The part of your brain built specifically to locate the people you love, spinning, searching, coming up with nothing, over and over, for months, sometimes years.
That’s why we write books called Finding Him. Looking for Her. Why the entire language of grief sounds like a search party. Why so many of us feel, quite literally, lost. We’re not choosing that word for effect. Lost is the most accurate word available.
We’re not being poetic when we say that. We’re lost, and the oldest part of the brain, the part that has nothing to do with logic or belief, is still checking coordinates that no longer exist.
The brain can’t find her in space or time, so it returns ‘nowhere.’ We can’t accept that answer. So it runs the search again.
“Nowhere” was never the right answer, and it was never true either. It was just the only answer the map could give while it was still looking in space and time.
She’s not nowhere. She’s everywhere.
She’s everywhere I put my attention. Wherever I stand, if I look for her, she’s already there. In the kitchen. In the car. In the middle of a sentence I didn’t finish.
That’s not denial, and it’s not a nice story I tell myself to feel better. It’s just where the map points now, once you stop asking it to find a single location and start letting it find her everywhere at once.
The door still doesn’t open at six. But I’ve stopped waiting for it to. I look somewhere else now, and she’s there too.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit grief2growth.substack.com/subscribe (https://grief2growth.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2)
